The Scepter or Staff Essay -- Analysis, Odysseus

I would argue the scepter and staff are metaphors for defined authority, a representation of the rule of law and Guardianship of public weal. Furthermore, I would argue that not all sectors are made equal, nor do all bearers process and equal position of ascendancy, ability to compel obedience, or Dominion. For instance Agamemnons royal scepter represents an authority that has come surmount to him from Zeus through several generations of Argive kings, meaning divine right, and heritage. They are tools of distinction, imparting a extra honor, and denoting superiority of character on the individual who wields it. Both the scepter and staff are embodiments of authority, approved and legitimated by the Gods. The scepter and staff bestow Godlike powers on mortals, imparting providence in men over earthly affairs. The scepter grants authority and legitimizes the carriers influence.The scepter or staff first appears in scroll 1 line 14, moreover he bore in his hand the scepter of Apollo wreathed with a suppliants wreath. The term moreover stresses a crucial aspect of the non-Christian priest campaign, the scepter of Apollo. Here the scepter is a substitution for the authority of Apollo. An authority worthy of high respect, subsidizes the actions of Khryses. This authority is not a function of royal lineage, superior military or tactical excellence, but a consequence or reward for devotion. Khryses bore Apollos scepter indicating the approval of the divine, and enduing the priest with the Gods authority. In scroll 1 line 20 the appearance of Khryses before the Danaans in scroll 1 line 20 is initially marked by their respect for the priest and his request. Most Achaeans recognized the authority that the priest wielded, and thou... ... look at the scepter or staff, as a representation of authority is very well suited to the song. These objects are referred to as imperishable, which is definitely associated with the gods. In the Iliad the manner in which the sector is used further demonstrates the divine authority implied by. This authority encompasses the ideas of honor, glory, distinction, and most importantly power. I believe that we also get to see the various ways in which one might find such authority in their hand. There is the authority passed down through generations in power, the authority due to a connection and devotion to the gods, the authority earned through military prowess, and the authority accrued through adroit distinction. No matter the manner in which the holder of the staff or scepter has obtained to their authority the gods are the ultimate source of this authority.

Social Captial: Richardo D. Stanton-Salazar and Douglas Foley :: essays research papers

For this critical analysis, the first article I have chosen to evaluate A Social Capital Framework for Understanding the Socialization of Racial Minority Children and Youths by Richardo D. Stanton-Salazar. This article surprised me in various ways and gave me mixed emotions. The occasion details a network-analytic framework to understand the socialization and schooling experiences of working-class racial minority youth. Stanton-Salazar examined the relationships between youth and institutional agents which plays in the greater multicultural context in which working-class minority youth must negotiate. Stanton-Salazar also provides how students developed cultural strategies to overcome the various obstacles and how they manage to develop sustaining and supportive relationships with institutional agents.Right in the beginning of the article, Stanton-Salazar used a terminology that surprised me. He referred to African American and Latino children as living in economically disenfranchi sed urban communities. I immediately thought, What is that? Its just a prettier way of sugar coating the terminology of the truth of where children livein the ghetto For whatsoever reason, the terminology he used upset me. Why didnt Stanton-Salazar use vocabulary that the rest of the world is banked to using instead of hiding behind his figure college degrees? That just bothered me because in reality, there is no nice way of stating the fact and it surely doesnt help the problem in any way. pathetic on, Stanton-Salazar states contemporary scholars who study minority children and youth have tried to address the lack of attention to racial variations in socialization, bringing light the developmental challenges this meeting faces If Im reading the statement correctly, I believe that its quite the opposite. I think that society addresses ethnicity first and foremost. The ethnicity of any minority host is the first to obtain any attention and it descends in a downward spiral from t here. Continuing with the reading, Stanton-Salazar quotes another(prenominal) individual, Sennett and Cobb, the power of institutional agents lies in their ability to earn or withhold knowledge which results in the institutional playing a game of whos going to be successful in society or fail. People who might withhold study may have something against a student or may think that he/she would benefit from the resource than another student. In reading this statement, it got me thinking about when I was a student in high school. Long story short, I had teachers and counselors hold back information from me that would have been useful to me now.