Social Captial: Richardo D. Stanton-Salazar and Douglas Foley :: essays research papers

For this critical analysis, the first article I have chosen to evaluate A Social Capital Framework for Understanding the Socialization of Racial Minority Children and Youths by Richardo D. Stanton-Salazar. This article surprised me in various ways and gave me mixed emotions. The occasion details a network-analytic framework to understand the socialization and schooling experiences of working-class racial minority youth. Stanton-Salazar examined the relationships between youth and institutional agents which plays in the greater multicultural context in which working-class minority youth must negotiate. Stanton-Salazar also provides how students developed cultural strategies to overcome the various obstacles and how they manage to develop sustaining and supportive relationships with institutional agents.Right in the beginning of the article, Stanton-Salazar used a terminology that surprised me. He referred to African American and Latino children as living in economically disenfranchi sed urban communities. I immediately thought, What is that? Its just a prettier way of sugar coating the terminology of the truth of where children livein the ghetto For whatsoever reason, the terminology he used upset me. Why didnt Stanton-Salazar use vocabulary that the rest of the world is banked to using instead of hiding behind his figure college degrees? That just bothered me because in reality, there is no nice way of stating the fact and it surely doesnt help the problem in any way. pathetic on, Stanton-Salazar states contemporary scholars who study minority children and youth have tried to address the lack of attention to racial variations in socialization, bringing light the developmental challenges this meeting faces If Im reading the statement correctly, I believe that its quite the opposite. I think that society addresses ethnicity first and foremost. The ethnicity of any minority host is the first to obtain any attention and it descends in a downward spiral from t here. Continuing with the reading, Stanton-Salazar quotes another(prenominal) individual, Sennett and Cobb, the power of institutional agents lies in their ability to earn or withhold knowledge which results in the institutional playing a game of whos going to be successful in society or fail. People who might withhold study may have something against a student or may think that he/she would benefit from the resource than another student. In reading this statement, it got me thinking about when I was a student in high school. Long story short, I had teachers and counselors hold back information from me that would have been useful to me now.